Political activism for the construction of new food markets

a comparative institutional analysis between Brazil and Chile

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.26.961

Keywords:

sustainable food systems, civic markets, agroecology, social movements

Abstract

This article presents a comparative institutional analysis of the peasant movements’ activism for the construction of new food markets in Brazil and Chile. Data were collected between March 2016 and December 2018 through interviews with leaders of these movements, policymakers and direct observation of different marketing initiatives. The results reveal that the Brazilian institutional trajectory opened up more space for the activism of agrarian social movements, such as the Landless Rural Workers Movement (MST), in the construction of markets that incorporate values ​​associated with the principles of agroecology and food sovereignty. On the other hand, in Chile, this type of activism proved to be less present in the peasant movements’ repertoire of action. In this country, due to the fragmentation of these movements as an effect of the strong repression of the military regime, the main initiatives are associated with specific public policies and, therefore, face problems for scaling up.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altieri M. Impactos de la agroecología en algunos países latinoamericanos: una aproximación histórica. LEISA. 2016;32(3):5-8.

Fligstein N, McAdam D. A theory of fields. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. 256p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199859948.001.0001

Gómez SE. El caso de Chile. La Revista Agraria. 2018;186:26-9.

Hodgson GM. From micro to macro: the concept of emergence and the role of institutions. In: Burlamaqui L, Castro AC, Chang HJ, editors. Institutions and the role of the state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2000. p. 103-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782543152.00012

Levidow L, Pimbert M, Vanloqueren G. Agroecological research: conforming—or transforming the dominant agro-food regime? Agroecol Sustain Food Syst. 2014;38:1127-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2014.951459

Mahoney J, Thelen K. A Theory of gradual institutional change. In: Mahoney J, Thelen K, editors. Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 1-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806414.003

McMichael P. Regimes alimentares e questões agrárias. São Paulo: UNESP; 2016. 256p.

Niederle P, Perez-Casarino J. Construção social de mercados. In: Dias AP, Stauffer AB, Moura LHG, Vargas MC, editors. Dicionário de Agroecologia e Educação. 1 ed. São Paulo: Expressão Popular; 2021. p. 259-64.

Niederle PA, Wesz Júnior V. Agrifood System Transitions in Brazil. London: Routledge; 2020. 258p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003028123

Pizarro Muñoz EF. Mercados das agriculturas familiares e camponesas: uma análise institucional comparada entre Brasil e Chile [doctoral’s thesis]. Porto Alegre (BR): Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-graduação em Desenvolvimento Rural; 2019. 267p.

Ploeg JD. Camponeses e impérios alimentares: lutas por autonomia e sustentabilidade na era da globalização. Porto Alegre: UFRGS; 2008. 372p.

Polanyi K. A grande transformação: as origens da nossa época. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2000. 337p.

Révillion JPP, Badejo MS. Gestão e planejamento de organizações agroindustriais. Porto Alegre: UFRGS; 2011. 95p.

Sabourin E, Grisa C, Niederle P, Leite S, Milhorance C, Sauer S, Ferreira A, Andriguetto-Filho J. Le démantèlement des politiques publiques rurales et environnementales au Brésil. Cahiers Agricultures. 2020;29:31. doi:10.1051/cagri/2020029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2020029

Schneider S. Mercados e agricultura familiar: construção de mercados e agricultura familiar: desafios para o desenvolvimento rural. Porto Alegre: UFRGS; 2016. 416p.

Winn P. A revolução chilena. São Paulo: UNESP; 2010. 216p.

Published

2022-08-11

How to Cite

1.
Pizarro Muñoz EF, Niederle PA. Political activism for the construction of new food markets: a comparative institutional analysis between Brazil and Chile. Agrocienc Urug [Internet]. 2022 Aug. 11 [cited 2024 Jul. 4];26(NE3):e961. Available from: http://mail.revista.asocolderma.org.co/index.php/agrociencia/article/view/961

Issue

Section

Article
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views